Table of Contents
OPINION
Year : 2020  |  Volume : 5  |  Issue : 4  |  Page : 171-174

Warfarin or non-Vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants: Navigating the choice of oral anticoagulant drugs in the COVID-19 pandemic era


Department of Cardiology, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin, China

Date of Submission27-May-2020
Date of Acceptance23-Jul-2020
Date of Web Publication30-Dec-2020

Correspondence Address:
Qing Yang
Department of Cardiology, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, 154, Anshan Road, Heping District, Tianjin 300052
China
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/2470-7511.305417

Get Permissions

  Abstract 


Emerging evidence indicates that thromboembolic complications are a key determinant of inhospital mortality of patients with COVID-19. Prophylactic anticoagulation therapy is an important component of inhospital management of patients with COVID-19. Considering that millions of patients worldwide are prescribed oral anticoagulation therapy, herein, we summarize the pros and cons of non-Vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) and warfarin, in terms of pharmacodynamics, and therapeutic efficacy and adverse effect monitoring in the context of the global pandemic of COVID-19. Despite a lack of evidence from high-quality randomized trials, an NOAC, rather than warfarin, would be a scientifically reasonable treatment option for patients with COVID-19 in the outpatient setting.

Keywords: COVID-19; Non-Vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants; Oral anticoagulant; Warfarin


How to cite this article:
Cai H, Zhou X, Yang Q. Warfarin or non-Vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants: Navigating the choice of oral anticoagulant drugs in the COVID-19 pandemic era. Cardiol Plus 2020;5:171-4

How to cite this URL:
Cai H, Zhou X, Yang Q. Warfarin or non-Vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants: Navigating the choice of oral anticoagulant drugs in the COVID-19 pandemic era. Cardiol Plus [serial online] 2020 [cited 2021 Jun 23];5:171-4. Available from: https://www.cardiologyplus.org/text.asp?2020/5/4/171/305417




  Introduction Top


Recent reports from the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) frontline in China have shown that disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC), which is featured by thrombocytopenia, an elevated d-dimer level, and prolonged thrombin time, is a common and aggravating factor for the progression of COVID-19 severity.[1],[2] Moreover, subsequent studies in China and other countries confirmed a high prevalence of deep venous thrombosis (DVT) by either lower extremity ultrasound or postpartum examination.[3],[4] Recognizing the risks of DIC and DVT in critical COVID-19 patients, on March 25 and on April 15, 2020, the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis and the American College of Cardiology published consensus statements aiming to provide risk stratification at admission for COVID-19 patients.[5],[6] The guidelines recommend the prophylactic use of unfractionated heparin/low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for DIC and DVT prevention in indicated patients. In support of this recommendation, a recent observational study in China confirmed that among severe COVID-19 patients with sepsis-induced coagulopathy score ≥4, the 28-day mortality was significantly lower in those treated with LMWH than in those who did not receive LMWH treatment.[7] This finding provided proof-of-principle evidence supporting the value of anticoagulation during COVID-19 hospitalization.


  Warfarin versus Non-Vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulants in Clinical Practice Top


Millions of patients worldwide are prescribed oral anticoagulation therapy. The indications for oral anticoagulation include stroke prevention in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation with CHA2 DS2-VASc score ≥2 in men or ≥3 in women, valvular atrial fibrillation, intracardiac thrombi, DVT and/or pulmonary embolism, hip or knee replacement surgery, prolonged immobilization, solid tumor (except liver tumor), and thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura [Figure 1]. In addition, recent evidence from the Cardiovascular Outcomes for People Using Anticoagulation Strategies trial has demonstrated the efficacy and safety of a combination of a low-dose non-Vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant (NOAC) (rivaroxaban 2.5 mg twice daily) and aspirin in reducing ischemic events in patients with stable coronary heart disease or peripheral artery disease.[8],[9],[10] Millions of patients worldwide are prescribed oral anticoagulation therapy in cardiology as well as other medical specialties.
Figure 1: Recommendations for oral anticoagulant selection during the global pandemic of COVID-19, considering the advantages of NOACs over warfarin (listed in the lower right box), we recommend NOACs as the choice of anticoagulant among non-COVID-19 patients in outpatients setting. *Indicating new evidence from the COMPASS trial for patients with stable coronary heart disease or peripheral artery disease. AF: Atrial fibrillation, COVID-19: coronavirus disease 2019, DVT: Deep vein thrombosis, INR: International normalized ratio, NOACs: Non-Vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants, PE: Pulmonary embolism, SARS-CoV2: severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2, CHD: coronary heart disease, PAD: peripheral arterial disease, DIC: disseminated intravascular coagulation

Click here to view


The selection of an oral anticoagulant requires the consideration of comorbidities, such as renal or hepatic dysfunction, thrombocytopenia, and gastrointestinal tract function. Emerging evidence from large randomized clinical trials supports the safety and effectiveness of NOACs (i.e., dabigatran, apixaban, and rivaroxaban) in preventing stroke or systemic embolic events. All NOACs have clinical advantages over warfarin owing to fewer drug–drug and dietary interactions, reproducible pharmacological profiles, decreased risk of intracranial bleeding, and no need for frequent testing of the international normalized ratio (INR) for dose adjustments. However, except in patients with moderate-to-severe mitral stenosis and mechanical heart valve replacement, for whom there is no available clinical evidence to support the use of NOACs, warfarin still has its market share in prescriptions for most of the clinical indications NOACs have been approved for. For example, the NOAC prescription rate for atrial fibrillation is <50% of the warfarin prescription rate across various insurance plans in clinical practice.[11]


  Warfarin and Bleeding Complications in Sepsis and COVID-19 Top


Warfarin inhibits the Vitamin K oxidoreductase, thereby preventing γ-carboxylation activation of the coagulation factors II, VII, IX, and X. Thus, warfarin administration can induce a pharmacological depletion of selective coagulation factors. Currently, the mechanisms triggering and factors underlying DIC initiation and progression in the setting of COVID-19 are not well understood. Pathologically, DIC evolution is characterized by systemic microvascular thrombus formation, depletion of coagulation factors, and consequently, overt systemic hemorrhage. The coagulation function is temporally directly or indirectly altered as a result of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection and proliferation or viral sepsis-mediated endothelial dysfunction, inflammatory response, and platelet activation.[12],[13] These pathological processes would consequently lead to a transient hypercoagulability,[14],[15] which, when left uncontrolled, may evolve into pre-DIC and DIC. When taking into account the pharmacological action of warfarin, we would raise the safety concern that warfarin-induced selective depletion of coagulation factors may contribute to aggravation of hemorrhage in COVID-19 patients. In support of this, a registry-based nationwide Danish population study showed that in atrial fibrillation patients who are on warfarin therapy at sepsis, the risk of bleeding is increased within the 3 months following sepsis.[16]


  Therapeutic Potential of Non-Vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulants in Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation Top


A recent systemic review summarized the available evidence concerning the use of NOACs in the treatment of DIC. Despite the limited sample size (a total of 21 patients in 15 case studies), this review revealed that NOACs seem therapeutically equivalent at least to heparin in patients with prevalent thrombotic phenotypes, including sepsis, vascular malformations, aortic aneurysm, aortic dissection, heparin-induced thrombocytopenia, chemotherapy for cancer, and Klippel–Trenaunay syndrome.[17] Notably, some case studies elegantly demonstrated the role of warfarin versus NOACs in the setting of DIC. For example, the clinical manifestations of aortic aneurysm associated with chronic DIC were dramatically improved when warfarin was replaced with rivaroxaban.[18] Therefore, the inhibition of activated coagulation factors, such as activated factor II (thrombin) or factor X via NOACs, holds promising potential for the treatment of DIC. Conversely, warfarin, which decreases the level of Vitamin K-dependent coagulation factors, cannot inhibit activated coagulation, a key step in initiating DIC, and therefore is ineffective in DIC.


  Advantages of Non-Vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulants over Warfarin during the COVID-19 Pandemic Top


During the COVID-19 pandemic, the use of NOACs precludes the necessity of frequent testing for INR, which has an obvious advantage in reducing the risk of exposure to SARS-CoV-2 in hospital. In addition, sepsis-associated coagulopathy is typically featured by prolonged thrombin time or elevated INR in conjunction with thrombocytopenia. A recent study showed that abnormal INR provides different information about the coagulation status in patients with DIC than in patients receiving warfarin due to the different nature, which indicates that an equivalent increased INR may predict different bleeding risks in patients with sepsis and those on warfarin therapy.[19] Moreover, a single case report showed that even in the postacute phase of COVID-19, patients on warfarin therapy may have liable INR.[20] These findings add to the complexity of interpreting INR results in patients on warfarin complicated by COVID-19.


  Recommendations for Anticoagulant Choice during the COVID-19 Pandemic Top


Based on warfarin's pharmacological mechanism and the issues of inaccuracy and liability when interpreting INR results in the setting of sepsis and COVID-19, as well as social factors during the COVID-19 pandemic, i.e., home quarantine and the willingness to reduce the risk of exposure to SARS-CoV-2 in hospital, we recommend that clinicians consider NOACs as the optimal choice when oral anticoagulation therapy is indicated in the outpatient setting during the COVID-19 pandemic [Figure 1]. Moreover, if not contraindicated, patients currently on warfarin may benefit from a transfer to NOACs. Although our experience with NOACs for the treatment of DIC is limited, the use of NOACs in the outpatient setting may be at least regarded as a prophylactic approach to reduce the risks of DIC and DVT and may consequently change the clinical course. Moreover, in COVID-19 patients with DIC and DVT risk and currently on LMWH treatment, when the differential diagnosis of the concomitant thrombocytopenia is challenging, i.e., COVID-19-induced versus heparin-induced thrombocytopenia, an alternative choice could be using one NOAC.

It should be noted that despite the advantages of NOACs over warfarin discussed above, among severe COVID-19 patients hospitalized for treatment, the use of antiviral agents (lopinavir, ritonavir, or darunavir) would significantly increase the plasma NOAC level due to drug–drug interaction.[21] Therefore, in COVID-19 patients who are currently on antiviral treatment, all oral anticoagulants should be transferred to unfractionated heparin/LMWH. Currently, the optimal dosing of unfractionated heparin and LMWH for the prophylaxis and treatment of COVID-19 patients remains unknown. The type and dosing should be adjusted based on available guideline recommendations,[6] for example, weight-adjusted dosing. In these times of uncertainty and urgency with the COVID-19 pandemic, despite the unavailability of evidence from high-quality randomized trials, the choice of one NOAC, rather than warfarin, would be a scientifically reasonable option for indicated patients in the outpatient setting.

Financial support and sponsorship

This work was supported by the Tianjin Municipal Science and Technology Commission (18ZXZNSY00290) and National Natural Science Foundation of China (81970304).

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.



 
  References Top

1.
Zhang Y, Xiao M, Zhang S, Xia P, Cao W, Jiang W, et al. Coagulopathy and antiphospholipid antibodies in patients with COVID-19. N Engl J Med 2020;382:e38. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc2007575.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Guan WJ, Ni ZY, Hu Y, Liang WH, Ou CQ, He JX, et al. Clinical characteristics of coronavirus disease 2019 in China. N Engl J Med 2020;382:1708-20. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2002032.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Zhang L, Feng X, Zhang D, Jiang C, Mei H, Wang J, et al. Deep vein thrombosis in hospitalized patients with COVID-19 in Wuhan, China: Prevalence, risk factors, and outcome. Circulation 2020;142:114-28. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.120.046702.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Wichmann D, Sperhake JP, Lütgehetmann M, Steurer S, Edler C, Heinemann A, et al. Autopsy findings and venous thromboembolism in patients with COVID-19: A prospective cohort study. Ann Intern Med 2020;173:268-77. doi: 10.7326/M20-2003.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Thachil J, Tang N, Gando S, Falanga A, Cattaneo M, Levi M, et al. ISTH interim guidance on recognition and management of coagulopathy in COVID-19. J Thromb Haemost 2020;18:1023-6. doi: 10.1111/jth.14810.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Bikdeli B, Madhavan MV, Jimenez D, Chuich T, Dreyfus I, Driggin E, et al. COVID-19 and thrombotic or thromboembolic disease: Implications for prevention, antithrombotic therapy, and follow-Up: JACC State-of-the-Art review. J Am Coll Cardiol 2020;75:2950-73. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.04.031.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Tang N, Bai H, Chen X, Gong J, Li D, Sun Z. Anticoagulant treatment is associated with decreased mortality in severe coronavirus disease 2019 patients with coagulopathy. J Thromb Haemost 2020;18:1094-9. doi: 10.1111/jth.14817.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Eikelboom JW, Connolly SJ, Bosch J, Dagenais GR, Hart RG, Shestakovska O, et al. Rivaroxaban with or without aspirin in stable cardiovascular disease. N Engl J Med 2017;377:1319-30. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1709118.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Branch KR, Probstfield JL, Eikelboom JW, Bosch J, Maggioni AP, Cheng K, et al. Rivaroxaban with or without aspirin in patients with heart failure and chronic coronary or peripheral artery disease. Circulation 2019;140:529-37. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.119.039609.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Connolly SJ, Eikelboom JW, Bosch J, Dagenais G, Dyal L, Lanas F, et al. Rivaroxaban with or without aspirin in patients with stable coronary artery disease: An international, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet 2018;391:205-18. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)32458-3.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Yong CM, Liu Y, Apruzzese P, Doros G, Cannon CP, Maddox TM, et al. Association of insurance type with receipt of oral anticoagulation in insured patients with atrial fibrillation: A report from the American College of Cardiology NCDR PINNACLE registry. Am Heart J 2018;195:50-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2017.08.010.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Zhou X, Li Y, Yang Q. Antiplatelet therapy after percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with COVID-19: Implications from clinical features to pathologic findings. Circulation 2020;141:1736-8. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.120.046988.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Li H, Liu L, Zhang D, Xu J, Dai H, Tang N, et al. SARS-CoV-2 and viral sepsis: Observations and hypotheses. Lancet 2020;395:1517-20. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30920-X.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Ackermann M, Verleden SE, Kuehnel M, Haverich A, Welte T, Laenger F, et al. Pulmonary vascular endothelialitis, Thrombosis, and angiogenesis in COVID-19. N Engl J Med 2020;383:120-8. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2015432.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
Connors JM, Levy JH. COVID-19 and its implications for thrombosis and anticoagulation. Blood 2020;135:2033-40. doi: 10.1182/blood.2020006000.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
Søgaard M, Skjøth F, Kjældgaard JN, Lip G, Larsen TB. bleeding complications in anticoagulated patients with atrial fibrillation and sepsis: A propensity-weighted cohort study. J Am Heart Assoc 2017;6:e007453. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.117.007453.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.
Lippi G, Langer F, Favaloro EJ. Direct oral anticoagulants for disseminated intravascular coagulation: An alliterative wordplay or potentially valuable therapeutic interventions? Semin Thromb Hemost 2020;46:457-64. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-3402478.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.
Kadohira Y, Yamada S, Matsuura E, Hayashi T, Morishita E, Nakao S, et al. Aortic Aneurysm-associated Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation that Responded Well to a Switch from Warfarin to Rivaroxaban. Intern Med 2017;56:2913-7. doi: 10.2169/internalmedicine.8666-16.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.
Walborn A, Williams M, Fareed J, Hoppensteadt D. International normalized ratio relevance to the observed coagulation abnormalities in warfarin treatment and disseminated intravascular coagulation. Clin Appl Thromb Hemost 2018;24:1033-41. doi: 10.1177/1076029618772353.  Back to cited text no. 19
    
20.
Trevisan C, Miconi L, Barbierato E, Marinaro G, Targhetta S, D'agata M, et al. Labile PT-INR in a COVID-19 patient under long-term Vitamin K antagonist therapy: A case report. SN Compr Clin Med 2020;19:1-3. doi: 10.1007/s42399-020-00460-4.  Back to cited text no. 20
    
21.
Testa S, Prandoni P, Paoletti O, Morandini R, Tala M, Dellanoce C, et al. Direct oral anticoagulant plasma levels' striking increase in severe COVID-19 respiratory syndrome patients treated with antiviral agents: The Cremona experience. J Thromb Haemost 2020;18:1320-3. doi: 10.1111/jth.14871.  Back to cited text no. 21
    


    Figures

  [Figure 1]



 

Top
 
  Search
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
Abstract
Introduction
Warfarin versus ...
Warfarin and Ble...
Therapeutic Pote...
Advantages of No...
Recommendations ...
References
Article Figures

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed1406    
    Printed16    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded120    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal